Hi Gurus,
Is there any possibility to deletion group and group count after used result recording and UD. when I am trying to delete system prompt message " still used in inspection lots but I cleared all lots ( UD has been done)
Let me know procedure incase any body face same issue.
Hi,
We are producing some of our products against a customer and due to some reasons we need to assign a new sales order using movement type 413E.
since the product is sensitive, we need to reinspect the product on this assignment.
is there any way to trigger Quality inspection on movement type 413E?
Regards
CR
Dear QM Experts,
I just realizied that I need to change the standard sap script document for the inspection instruction.
I've checked the SE71 and found out the name of the sap script:
Can i somehow put there my own Z-Sap script instead of standard one? Or will it be better just to change the standard one?
Have someone already had some expirience with this?
BR
Denis
QM gurus,
I am bringing interesting scenario, let me explain my inspection plans has been created on 01/03/2016 and Material revision valid from 01/03/2015. while doing MIGO lot has been created in CRTD status and plan not assigning to lot automatic or if try assign manual also. if I try without revision goods receipt inspection plan determining automatic ... let me know any settings is required for automatic determination of inspection plan.
Hi,
I cannot achieve to avoid the inspection at GR with a material/vendor certified.
- Vendor Master: I have mantained the "Actual QM sus" with the relevant value.
- QM info record: I have mantained the same "Existing QM sys" value as at the vendor master and I have selected the value "Inspection active, if vendor is not certified" at the "Insp.control" field.
- Material master: I have mantained the "Target QM system" with a value that includes the "Existin QM sys" and the "Actual QM sys".
Despite this, the system creates a lot inspection when I do the GR.
¿What i'm doing wrong?
Thanks.
Regards,
OCS
Dear QM experts,
after an inspection lot will be created I start to do the inspection by usning of QE51N, and when I have some failed characteristic following pop-up comes up and I have to tipp an error code:
The question: how can I avoid this pop-up? My process doesn't need any error code.
BR
Denis
Hi,
I am trying to change the quality notification type (in transaction - QM02) from one notification type to another notification type. As per system configuration settings, the notification types are maintained as allowed for changing the notification type.
However, the option of changing the quality notification type is not available on the screen of QM02.
Can anyone guide on this issue?
Is there any config missing?
Regards,
Prashant
Hello all,
Into QM notes there is an option to send emails about defects into QM note, and we can insert 1 email to send it's informations. It works fine.
But I need to insert more than one mail, in this case I would need at least 3 mails to be inserted.
Then system reject it with a message RECIPIENT DOES NOT EXIST IN THE ADDRESS MANAGEMENT.
I have tryed find some custo in SPRO for QM Notification but I couldn't.
Does anyone have already faced that situation, please?
Thanks,
Danilo
Use
The purpose of this activity is to define the code groups.
Procedure
IMG Menu |
|
Transaction Code | QS41 |
Field name | Description | User action and values | Comment |
Code group |
| YB02-01 |
|
Short text |
| Vendor Problem at Goods Receipt |
|
Status of code group |
| 2 | Released |
Catalog | Code group | Short text | Status of code group | Usage indicator |
1 | YB02-01 | Appearance | 2 |
|
1 | YB03-01 | Appearance | 2 |
|
3 | YB02-01 | Usage Decision at Goods Receipt | 2 |
|
3 | YB03-01 | Usage Decision at Goods Receipt | 2 |
|
9 | YB02-01 | Overall Appearance | 2 |
|
9 | YB03-01 | Overall Workmanship Appearance | 2 |
|
D | YB03-01 | Notification GR external processing | 2 |
|
D | YB03-02 | Notification GR production order | 2 |
|
Result
The code groups have been defined.
Maintaining Catalogs - Creating Codes
Use
The purpose of this activity is to define the code.
Procedure
IMG Menu |
|
Transaction Code | QS41 |
Field name | Description | User action and values | Comment |
Code |
| 01 |
|
Short Text |
| Delivery problem |
|
Code |
| 02 |
|
Short Text |
| Constructive design problem |
|
Code |
| 03 |
|
Short Text |
| Vendor problem |
|
Usage Indicator |
| X |
|
Catalog | Code group | Code | Short text | Defect class | Usage indicator |
1 | YB02-01 | 01 | okay |
| X |
1 | YB02-01 | 02 | not okay |
| X |
1 | YB03-01 | 01 | okay |
| X |
1 | YB03-01 | 02 | not okay |
| X |
3 | YB02-01 | 01 | Quality test complied |
| X |
3 | YB02-01 | 02 | Quality test failed (to blocked stock) |
| X |
3 | YB03-01 | 01 | Quality test complied |
| X |
3 | YB03-01 | 02 | Quality test failed |
| X |
9 | YB02-01 | 1 | Material defects | 01 |
|
9 | YB02-01 | 11 | Wrong component | 01 |
|
9 | YB02-01 | 12 | Defective component | 01 | X |
9 | YB02-01 | 7 | Visible defects | 03 |
|
9 | YB02-01 | 71 | Dirtiness | 04 |
|
9 | YB02-01 | 72 | Incorrect labeling | 03 |
|
9 | YB02-01 | 73 | Mechanical damage | 03 |
|
9 | YB02-01 | 8 | Incorrect packaging | 03 |
|
9 | YB03-01 | 020 | Appearance not acceptable | 01 | X |
D | YB03-01 | 01 | External processing problem |
| X |
D | YB03-02 | 01 | Internal manufacturing problem |
| X |
Result
The coding has been defined.
Prerequisites
Codes and code groups for characteristic attributes have been created.
Procedure
IMG Menu |
|
Transaction Code | QS51 |
Field name | Description | User action and values | Comment |
Selected set |
| YB02-01 |
|
Short text |
| Appearance |
|
Status |
| 2 | Released |
Catalog | Plant | Selected set | Short text | Status | Usage Indicator |
1 | 1000 | YB03-01 | Appearance | 2 |
|
3 | 1000 | YB02-01 | Usage Decision at Goods Receipt | 2 |
|
3 | 1000 | YB03-01 | Usage Decision at Goods Receipt | 2 |
|
Result
The selected sets have been defined.
Prerequisites
The selected set for characteristic attributes has been created.
Procedure
IMG Menu |
|
Transaction Code | QS51 |
Field name | Description | User action and values | Comment |
Code group |
| YB02-01 |
|
Code |
| 01 | okay |
Valuation Code |
| A | Accepted |
Code group |
| YB02-01 |
|
Code |
| 02 | not okay |
Valuation Code |
| R | rejected |
Defect class |
| 02 | Major defect A |
Catalog | Plant | Selected set | Code group | Code | Valuation Code | Defect class |
1 | 1000 | YB03-01 | YB03-01 | 01 | A |
|
1 | 1000 | YB03-01 | YB03-01 | 02 | R | Critical defect |
Catalog | Plant | Selected set | Code group | Code | Valuation Code | Quality score | Posting proposal UD | Stock screen backgr |
3 | 1000 | YB02-01 | YB02-01 | 01 | A | 100 | VMENGE01 | X |
3 | 1000 | YB02-01 | YB02-01 | 02 | R | 1 | VMENGE04 0 |
|
Catalog | Plant | Selected set | Code group | Code | Valuation Code | Quality score | Posting proposal UD | Stock screen backgr |
3 | 1000 | YB03-01 | YB03-01 | 01 | A | 100 | VMENGE01 | X |
3 | 1000 | YB03-01 | YB03-01 | 02 | R | 1 | VMENGE04 0 |
|
Result
The selected set codes have been defined.
Hi,
Despite the quality certificate is with the correct status, thes system doesn't allow me to do the GR of the material.
Thank you.
Regards,
OCS.
Dear Gurus,
In our scenary we have a specific document type is controlled by status. There is a specific status that we've created as Obsolete. Unfortunately the end user is getting to print it when the status for the document is selected as Obsolete. It is not correct and we would like that the system does not allow the user prints any document when the status is Obsolete. Is it possible? I mean, we wondering if you could help us with any tip about it?
I'd be glad to hear any experience about it too.
Please, if you need more detail let me know.
In advance, thanks a lot for your attention.
Best Regards,
Valdevair
Hi,Gurus
If i have many MIC ,the length 8 of MIC name is not enough ,what can I do?
Many thanks!
BR
Miriam Zhao
Hi Guru,
We have implemented auto usage decision in our project by using BAPI"BAPI_INSPLOT_SETUSAGEDECISION’" and it has job refer to T code ZQA11. Now the issue is that batch number is not getting assigned into the inspection lot but if we check in process order goods recipet tab batch number is displayed it while QA03 is not showing the batch number its happening for some particular orders.
I have checked the master recipe setting which is same for both process orders. Can anyone please help me to get this sorted our asap?
Regards
Jinto Joy
Hello Experts,
I discovered in my system that independent of Tick for "Post to inspection" for Inspection type 08, system posts stock to Quality Inspection and creates Inspection Lot after 322 movement.
For Inspection type 01 it works correctly, in case of missing tick, stock is posted to Unrestricted and Inspection Lot is created.
Is it designed way of work? Could it be some enhancement in our system?
In SAP help it is written:
"The indicator only has an effect when an inspection lot is created at the time of goods receipt"
So if it is designed only for Goods receipts, why it exists for Inspection type 08?
Best regards,
Jerzy
Hi,
How to change from status 2 ( processed) to 0 ( can be processed) during result recording?
Thank you
Hi friends,
Requirements by customer that QC will be performed at Good receipt against Production Order
and QC department will decide Material is A,B or C category material. And category status will be visible in inventory reports along material
On quality basis material will be categorized and material will be inventoried along with category .
please suggest me easiest way
thanks
Recently you may notice a problem that the GR material document is cancelled, but the corresponding inspection lot is not cancelled together with the material document. You can still see the inspection lot in t-code MD04.
Here is basically what happened:
Prerequisites:
Process:
Result:
Permanent fix:
Implement SAP Note 2186161. This note fixes a bug in this case. After applying this note, when you post new GR material document cancellations in MBST, the inspection lot will be cancelled together with it. Lot status becomes LTCA automatically and won't be displayed in MD04.
Inconsistency correction:
For existing inspection lots, to correct the inconsistency, follow the steps below:
Dear Pundits,
Please help me out.
Client wants to deactivate the field RQEVA-VMENGE02 (SCRAP Posting) in Usage decision.Can this be done by functional personnel if YES?? If not what specification should i give to ABAP personnel to help her understand the requirement??
Please Help
Hi QM gurus,
I am facing an issue related to key date in the inspection specifications tab of Inspection lot.
The inspection plan for my material(inspection type - 01) is created way back on 23rd May 2013 but the operations and MIC were created on 21st July 2015.
Now, when i do GR for this material, an inspection lot is being generated but it is not showing in QE51N.
I checked the key date in the inspection lot and it is same as the material revision level date.
But the actual system should generate this key date as the current date.
This problem is coming only for this material and for all the other materials the key date is same as the inspection lot created date.
Our user wants to record the usage decision only through QE51N.
Can anyone of you suggest why this revision level is being pulled and that too for only this particular material ?!!
Thanks,
Praveen.
Dear QM Experts,
i implemented a QM-Process for goods receipt. I have created 1 inspection plan with 7 MICs.
The Problem is that 1 MIC have to be check by every single goods receipt and the other 6 only by every thenth.
I have tried to create 2 different inpection plans and put the MIC, which has to be inspected by every goods receipt in the other plan and control them by using of dynamization rule....but than I had the problem that the inspection lot was not created, becouse the system didn't know which plan (both of them have usage '05'') has to be assigned to inspection plan.
Does anyone have an idea how this problem could be solved? How can a make this process dymaic? Is there may be any user-exit or badi or something?
I'd really apreciate this.
BR
Denis
